Lee Waters says if Swansea has serious ambitions to rank alongside Cardiff it needs to look towards Bristol where the elected Mayor (pictured) has brought a focus to the city.
Is Swansea Wales’ second City? In population terms certainly, but it seems a rather dated question – reflective of a time when the ‘principality’ was only worthy of two perhaps. With the elevation of Newport to city status it is probably more productive to think in terms of Wales having several ‘second cities’.
So what then of Swansea’s identity? That too is changing. The last census showed a growth in the city’s population of around 15,500 over the last decade with Swansea becoming more cosmopolitan (though still 94% white).
A 9.0% fall in the number of welsh speakers (greater than the 3.5% fall recorded for Wales over the period), underlines the sense that discussions about Swansea’s ‘identity’ are more appropriately framed in terms of the city having several ‘identities’.
Any sense of place, and the orientation of the people who live there, is of course dynamic. Identities are fluid, and are constantly changing. Swansea’s is rich and complex, but perhaps no more so than a similarly sized town in England.
The more relevant question for modern Swansea is ‘is it more than the sum of its parts?’. Without a coherent sense of direction Swansea risks being buffeted by the severe storms on the horizon.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that Welsh Councils face spending cuts of 18% in the next few years. Politicians will want to try and protect key frontline services like education and social services from the worst. But even assuming they can limit reductions in key areas to 9% that will mean that spending on other services will have to come down by an eye watering 52%. This is a game-changing scenario. Efficiency cuts, or collaboration, cannot produce savings of this magnitude. It will require real sacrifice and political pain as the budgets for libraries, parks, leisure centers, public toilets and other visible services are slashed.
This is something all Welsh councils will face, but Swansea enters this storm in an already battered state. Next year it has a projected deficit of £5m, with a forecast shortfall of £22m in 2015/16 and £35m in 2016/17.
Add into the mix Swansea’s weak economic base – the city falls within one of the poorest regions in the European Union; its dependency on the public sector – a third of its working population work for the state; and the fact that nearly 20% of its population is over 65; and it has higher than average percentage of residents with a long term health problem or disability (at just under a quarter).
Even a city secure in its identity and clear on its future direction would struggle to deal with these profound challenges. Swansea, however, is not in this position. My own experience of dealing with every authority in Wales in my previous role is that the city and county of Swansea is one of the weakest. My anecdotal canvassing of people ahead of last week’s IWA event in the city found that the two words most often repeated to describe the city’s politics were ‘messy’ and ‘nasty’.
“The current structure of local government – party political, ward-based councillors… – means that it can be more difficult to take tough, timely strategic decisions that, although they may create winners as well as losers, would benefit thecity overall.” Andrew Carter of the Centre for Cities think tank wrote in a wide-ranging report on the potential impact of directly elected mayors.
The report argued that Mayors, due to their strong ‘place-wide’ mandate, can help, both where they have formal authority and where they use ‘soft power’ to influence relationships across Government, business, and civil society. The evidence seems clear enough in Bristol. The capital of south west of England was just one of two cities that voted in referenda to replace their cabinet structure with a directly elected Mayor. George Ferguson, an independent, has brought both definition and flair to the city’s leadership.
Clearly an elected Mayor is no panacea. The multiple challenges Swansea faces would not melt away by the election of a single figure, no mater how dynamic. But it would help the City to articulate a unified vision for its future direction, and would help create a catalyst to the transform the culture and focus of the council bureaucracy. And if the system of using ‘open primaries’ to select candidates was adopted wholesale the process could be used to oxygenate Swansea’s politics.
If the city has serious ambitions to rank alongside Cardiff it needs to chart a new course. It cannot expect aid or support from elsewhere. This is a journey that has to be driven from within the city.
Swansea has a natural advantage in its location, and a tremendous opportunity in the growing reputation of the city’s University, but it is not yet doing enough to capitalise on either.
If it does not strike out in a fresh direction Swansea risks being overwhelmed by forces beyond its control, and the notion that it was ever considered a second city will be laden with pathos.
5 thoughts on “A second city – relegation for Swansea?”
Swansea has always had multiple identities. The city is an amalgamation of villages and suburbs, all of which have distinct identities. The success of Swansea University has undoubtedly increased the cosmopolitan mix, though many people based there say that it has absorbed other cultures, especially English ones, but it has done this by playing down its Welsh roots. What Swansea Council, and the city’s inhabitants, must do is to ensure that Swansea’s traditional identities and cultures are not lost. Landore and Hafod, where the Liberty Stadium sits, had a majority of Welsh speakers at the start of WW2. You are now more likely to hear Urdu before Welsh. Also, how many of today’s residents know anything about the copper heritage or the Mumbles Railway, or that Swansea Rugby Club was the first rugby club side in the world to beat New Zealand, South Africa and Australia. If you don’t know these things, or if you forget them, then your identity alters. History shapes our contemporary lives and identities. Whilst a debate on identites is refreshing, please don’t let people without sufficient knowledge, or empathy, shape our great city.
Swansea will always come out badly if it tries to play on the same level as Cardiff and Bristol. Swansea does not have the population, let alone a wealthy one. It should be playing to its strengths rather than trying to punch above its weight.
During almost all of Lee’s time at Sustrans I would concur with his description of city politics in Swansea as “messy” and “nasty”. Between 2004 and 2012 the council was stuck in no overall control with the Lib Dems cobbling together progressively weaker administrations bound by patronage and cronyism. As he also points out, the previous administration left behind a financial blackhole as a result of mismanagement (Service @ Swansea) and failure to do anything in the 2010/12 period to prepare for the inevitable tightening implied by the UK coalition government’s fiscal policy.
Longer term challenges exist too. The city centre is in probably terminal decline as a major retail hub. The reliance on public sector employers (particularly DVLA, 90% or so of whose activities – pretty much everything bar the print/postroom – could be carried out in, say India), poor skills base and shoddy housing and transport infrastructure are legacies that can’t be wished away. Silver linings include the University and the Swans, whilst the reversal of the coalition’s original decision to cancel rail electrification west of Cardiff maintains the city’s position as the natural end of the ‘M4 corridor’.
Moreover Swansea’s politics saw a return to normal service 15 months ago with Labour taking over two thirds of the seats and sweeping out many of the most unpleasant and “nasty” elements of the previous regime. Labour’s manifesto is commendable in the breath and vision it outlines for the city: http://www.welshlabour.org.uk/uploads/Swansea_Labour_Manifesto_2012_webver.pdf
With David Phillip’s secure until 2016, the leadership vacuum argument for directly elected mayors seems irrelevant. Labour may not succeed in delivering the ambitious programme above. The weaknesses and threats are all too real. But it has a clear mandate to try.
Henry Wilson comments about identity. Swansea needs a civic culture that reflects all of the population as it is now, including the ethnic minority communities and all the languages spoken in the city. Jacks should of course celebrate our history, but not live in it. Albert’s comment I agree with totally. Comparisons with Bristol and Cardiff are inevitable, but in Swansea is probably better off seeking inspiration from other ‘second order’ cities rather than obsessing over the advantages enjoyed by her direct competitors. Links with Cork at all levels need to drastically improve. Other UK cities worth a look for various reasons might include Plymouth, Norwich, Nottingham and Sheffield.
I don’t care if you do use inverted commas, the use of the term principality is at best an insult and at worst the sign of ignorance/stupidity. I stopped reading after that.
Comments are closed.