Vote Leave promises do not stack up

Gerald Holtham, the leading expert on Welsh government funding, attacks the Vote Leave camp for their promise to replace all EU funding.

Whatever the situation of the U.K. as a whole, I cannot believe that Wales would be better off outside the EU. Cardiff University research has demonstrated that Wales is a net beneficiary of EU funds, getting £245m each year more than we contribute via our share of UK payments. The claim that the UK government would maintain this net transfer to Wales is incredible.

EU Referendum

Leading up to the referendum on June 23rd, we’ll be publishing some key figures’ arguments for and against remaining in the EU.

You can find all of our articles on the EU referendum here.

The whole thrust of UK government policy over the past decades, particularly under Conservative governments, has been to reduce industrial intervention, abolish regional development bodies and reduce regional assistance. Regional policy has been left to the EU.

Regional assistance in the EU, from which Wales benefits, is part of the range of European  social programmes encompassing work conditions and workers rights.  These are all based on the principle of social solidarity – looking after each other – but are routinely described by the Leave campaign and Tory ministers as red tape.  Their deathbed conversion to the principles of solidarity which underlie regional assistance programmes is as believable as an alcoholic’s promise that the next drink would be his last.    

In fact a recent press release from the Leave camp gives the game away.  It says money for Wales would be spent “more efficiently” freeing funds to be spent on other things.  Translation: you are going to get less money because some of it will be diverted elsewhere.  That bit you can believe. Because the Leavers have used the figure for the UK’s gross payments to Brussels, ignoring what we get back.

If they were really going to maintain all the EU’s regional and farming spending in the UK, they would not be able to fulfil all their promises to spend more money on the NHS, defence and other things.

If there are savings in government spending from leaving the EU, ask yourself the following question: how high up the government’s priorities do you think Wales comes? If you think the answer is near the top, I have got bad news for you about Father Christmas.

But anyway, this whole argument is proceeding as if UK government revenues would be unaffected by leaving the EU so there would be a “saving” to spend somewhere.

A relatively small hiccup in economic growth would reduce tax revenues by more than the hypothesized saving.  Net spending on the EU is £8.5 billion a year of total government revenues around £700 billion, i.e.. just 1.2 per cent of the total. If GDP is only 1 per cent lower after Brexit  than it would otherwise have been, government revenue will fall more than the “saving”.  If we had a recession there would be a net loss running into billions.

The uncertainty and reductions in business investment in the event of Brexit will surely be more  than enough to eliminate all savings and leave the UK as a whole in a worse budgetary position for a number of years at least. That is more than supposition because we are already seeing anemia in business investment at the mere risk of Brexit. And if the UK sneezes, Wales will get pneumonia.

Comments are closed.

Also within Politics and Policy