The Programme for Government: ‘Could do better’

Owen Hathway assesses what the new Programme for Government offers in terms of education policy.

“Our future prosperity and stability depends on the skills and values of the people of Wales.  Education has a fundamental role to play in personal fulfilment, community development and wealth creation.”

The opening to the education section of the Welsh Government’s ‘Taking Wales Forward’ document makes a pretty important point.  Often, especially when commentators speak about education in relation to PISA, it can be all too easy to see our school system as nothing more than a factory for tomorrow’s workforce.  For today’s teaching workforce, who deal with pupils day in day out in classrooms across the country, it is far more than that.  

Of course education is an economic driver and that is both reflected in this opening gambit, and indeed in the structure of our skills based curriculum, but it is also about personal development and building a socially responsible and creative community.  With that in mind it is pleasing to see a range of pledges focused on this aspect of learning.

There is a reaffirming of the commitment to the Foundation Phase (albeit that it is sometimes hard to qualify this against the introduction of age-related expectations and literacy and numeracy testing which has skewed the ethos of the policy); there is a very welcome extension of the pupil deprivation grant; early years intervention strategies and specific focus on looked after children.  This is not to mention the politically controversial “legislation to end the defence of ‘Reasonable Punishment” – or smacking ban to you and I, finding its way onto the agenda.

Aside from this we see the key Labour and Lib Dem election pledges of an additional £100m of investment for school standards and a reduction in class sizes respectively both featured prominently.  We also see some big thinking policies such as the new curriculum, new ways of delivering supply teaching and the roll out of the digital competency framework.

However, while the above is encouraging, what is apparent throughout the document is that this is not a list that is heavy on accountability.  There are plenty of commitments to ‘review,’ ‘examine,’ ‘promote,’ and ‘prioritise’ but few targets to measure how those policies will be judged as successful.  At a time where one of the biggest bugbears of the education workforce is the harsh accountability measures and implications that go hand in hand with them, we seemingly have a programme for government without the metrics of measurements to fully hold the Welsh Government to account. What in practice does ‘developing closer links between universities and schools’ mean? How do we determine if the Welsh Government has succeeded in ‘supporting families and parents to reduce adverse childhood experiences’ in practical terms and how is a review of the current policy on surplus school places a policy in itself rather than the action it wields?  Even on those key pledges we are not given the fine print on where that £100m comes from and how it will be filtered out to schools or when and how the class sizes policy will be implemented.

The IWA’s Acting Director wrote a pretty damning review of the programme for government this week.  I have to say I very much share her sentiments that we should hope that this is “just an initial document and more detailed policy plans will be published over the coming few weeks and months.”

If what the Welsh Government intended with this piece of work was to simply establish a roadmap to the next 5 years it may prove to be a useful reference point.  The skeleton of their body of work will have been established with meat  to be added to these bones throughout the term. In many ways that is a natural position to have. We have to remember that in education more than anywhere else, as a result of a coalition of ideas between Labour and the Lib Dem manifestos, it may take time to work through the practicalities of delivering these policies.  However, if this document is designed to be the measuring stick by which the government expects to be held accountable then it will have failed to build a sense of trust from the education sector or the wider public.

Few in the education sector would argue against the aims and objectives of the Welsh Government.  The ambitions of this document are right but in spite of its publications we remain somewhat unclear as to how they will be achieved or evaluated.

Owen Hathway is the Policy Officer for NUT Cymru.

6 thoughts on “The Programme for Government: ‘Could do better’

  1. Hi J.Jones,

    Funny enough someone else sent me that guardian article yesterday also.

    I think our Foundation Phase was/is revolutionary. Where it works it is having a positive impact. My fear is that the Welsh Government have already lost a bit of nerve with it and even before we see the very first pupils who experienced the Foundation Phase fully go through the system we have already seen it undermined. The stocktake report into the Foundation Phase showed that the introduction of literacy and numeracy tests has skewed the ethos of policy in that headteachers and FP leads have felt the need to introduce more formal teaching to prepare for that testing period. In addition to that the decision to insist on age related expectations within the Foundation Phase totally contradicts the idea of stage not age that it was based on in the first instance.

  2. Again we need a mature public discussion if the public are to accept the philosophy of the Foundation Phase. While supported by evidence it is counter-intuitive to many people who want their kids “taught” from an early stage. When the politicians bring a policy in without adequate publicity and discussion they then tend to bottle out when there is public resistance – even when the resistance is poorly informed. The teaching unions have also queered the pitch by resisting any attempt to measure progress or performance in education at any stage. Their desire to keep parents in the dark and avoid accountability does not engender the necessary trust for innovative approaches to be given a fair chance..

  3. If we had a Government with the guts and imagination the devolution offered a unique opportunity for Wales to stand out but the Welsh Labour Government chose the Social Engineering before any other consideration and what we now have is an unmitigated disaster.

    Follow continentals and make 7 as the starting school age and make education compulsory till 18, then tighten up on teacher qualifications (England approach comes to mind, but have I used a ‘dirty word’), then make teaching a worthwhile, recognised and well paid profession that it deserves and should have!

  4. Hi R.Tredwyn,

    I’m sorry I can’t accept the statement:

    “the teaching unions have also queered the pitch by resisting any attempt to measure progress or performance in education at any stage. Their desire to keep parents in the dark and avoid accountability does not engender the necessary trust for innovative approaches to be given a fair chance..”

    It is simply not true. Working for a union I know full well that we are not opposed to accountability in the system. In fact I know I’ve made the case myself several times in public forums and in the media that accountability is absolutely welcome in education. It is just a case of finding the best form of delivering that. We have to question what and why we are measuring. Age related accountability in the Foundation Phase (a system based on the notion of stage not age for example) makes little sense. That is not to say we shouldn’t have ways of measuring the impact of the Foundation Phase.

    I also find the accusation that teaching unions wish to keep parents in the dark completely baseless. In fact only last week I was quoted in the Western Mail calling on parents to speak more often and more openly with schools about their children progress.

Comments are closed.

Also within Uncategorised

Become an IWA Member

Fighting for a Wales that is 100% powered by renewables by 2035.

Advocating for a stronger Welsh media through our Media Audits.

Bringing through new, unheard writers with our New Voices Fund.

We’re working to make Wales better.
Your support can help us do more.