Our place in two Unions

The Union of Wales, Scotland, England and Northern Ireland is dying. At the same time, we have as a union of four have elected to leave another Union with Europe. For the rights and wrongs of that decision, it was our decision to make, that no other party to that Union could prevent us from doing. As a friend of mine once said: “The UK is dying. Get over it. Better still, get ahead of it”. 

 

Unlike the EU, the UK does not provide a structure of Sovereignty that would allow for a unilateral withdrawal from its union. The important distinction here revolves around Section 30 of the Scotland Act 1998 and Article 50 of The Treaty of the European Union. Section 30 provides for The Scottish Parliament to get a temporary extension of power with which they can pass a referendum Act. This was the legal basis for the referendum in 2014 and would be the likely basis of any future “Indy Ref”. Compare this with Article 50, which provides that ‘Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.’ The difference here is staggering.

 

It is a difference of relationships and of power dynamics. In one union you are treated as an equal, a valued constituent part of a greater whole, responsible enough to make your own decisions. In the other, you are treated as if a child, not capable of taking control of your own destiny, maybe only getting your way when the parent has grown tired of your arguments. 

 

Whilst it is the subject of some academic wrangling if indeed the EU is a true confederation and fair question can be raised of attempting to emulate a system which you voted to leave only a few years prior, if the UK is to have any hope of surviving it must embrace the confederal nature of the EU and make each constituent unit equal. It must ensure that power derives from the periphery to the centre and not the other way around. This should not only apply to the Nations, but to the regions of England as well.

 

If the Union is to survive then it must do so as a Confederal Federation.

 

A confederation is “a system of government or administration in which two or more distinct political units keep their separate identity but transfer specified powers to a higher authority for reasons of convenience, mutual security, or efficiency.” In this case the subnational units control the central government, which is given only specific powers. It is similar to an intergovernmental organisation, in that the member states retain their autonomy and can control the central government. 

 

The union must ensure each constituent element is in charge of making the majority of its decisions and yes, that includes the decision to secede from the union if that element chooses to do so, in accordance with their own constitutional requirements. The UK would not accept being told what to do by France or Germany so why should it expect the same of its own constituent elements? 

 

The union as we know it is rotting and the smell is rank. One reason we know this is Brexit. Desire for independence in Wales and Scotland grows, but it grows stronger still when the prospect of a no deal Brexit is raised. In the North of Ireland, the question of Irish Reunification is answered with the most positivity if the idea of a hard border appears. Whilst there is a still an evident split on this issue across community lines, there is certainly more support for re-unification than there would otherwise be, for example if there were to be no hard Brexit.

 

Scotland and Northern Ireland voted strongly to remain, and Wales and England to leave. If we learnt lessons from the EU, which in many situations affords its member states a veto, each constituent element of the UK would have a veto on the decisions of the UK as an international entity. Exit from the EU could have been stopped for the UK by respecting the decision of the constituent entities in this case Scotland and Northern Ireland. Such a model was recommended by Nicola Sturgeon prior to the Brexit vote. This system could apply not only to the decision to leave the EU but to day to day governance. If one region or nation wants to govern itself in a particular way it should have the right to do so and not have to hope to catch the attention of Westminster when it is handing out scraps of attention. 

 

This confederal structure is not unique to the EU. Countries such as Belgium and Australia use variations of this practice in order to ensure that each constituent element has an equal say and if the Union is to survive then it will take a change such as this to make that happen.

 

You cannot expect compliance from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland on the desire of the English majority and expect that situation to be tolerable forever, nor can London and the South East expect compliance from the South West, North East or the Midlands of England. We must completely re-imagine this union if it is to survive. 

 

Photo by Hans-Peter Gauster on Unsplash

All articles published on Click on Wales are subject to IWA’s disclaimer.

Matthew Hexter is the Convener of the Welsh Fabians writing in a personal capacity

4 thoughts on “Our place in two Unions

  1. I very humbly agree that the consensus that has held the UK together has been totally fractured by the EU debate which has yet to come to its final end game. When the British empire has come to the end of the road the English ended it very quickly,and it morphed into the Commomwealth which is nice and touch and feely,however in reallity it means ZILCH. In the post Brexit world the English will turn its society/economy into a world beater as has happened in football,I.e EPL which is a world wide success story and is full of world class players from all over the world. The Scots and Welsh will be allowed to more away into socialist models,but without the funding from the City of London.At he age of 74 I could”not care less as both of my children and two grandsons now live over the border Welsh nationalism has won a useless victory as it has led to isolation and S4C and BBC CYMRU!! Gawd help us!!

  2. “If we learnt lessons from the EU, which in many situations affords its member states a veto, each constituent element of the UK would have a veto on the decisions of the UK as an international entity. ”

    If Brexit has taught us anything it is England will not want to listen to Wales, Scotland or N.Ireland. Mess-Minster see Brexit purely has an English issue and the Welsh, Scots and Irish should stop trying to interfere and push their own interests. Brexit will be a typical Mess-Minster one size fits all solution, were that size is London and the South East and the rest of England and the Celtic fringe can go to hell.

    Brexit is about England taking back control from the EU and England take back control of Wales, Scotland and N.Ireland.

    If we are to learn anything from Brexit it’s we need to put our financial and social needs first, even if that means taking a short-term hit for our long term benefit and the benefit of our children. If England can vote against it’s financial and security interests and vote to leave one union, we need a say on what union do we want to belong. Do we want to carry on belonging to a union in which our interests are ignored and we are plainly considered a nuisance at best, or do we want to join the EU, a union which will treat us as an equal. The UK is a dinosaur, living on its past glories, the empire and war are forever being rammed down our throats. The UK is the old man of Europe, it only has history, it has no future. If Wales and if our children and grandchildren are to have a future we need to have a vote on leaving the UK and re-joining the EU.

  3. The fantasy of a Brexit unicorn.
    The fantasy of a “Confederal Federation” unicorn.
    vesus
    The reality of the sense of English exceptionalism.
    The reality of the sense of English entitlement.

    There are reasons why unicorns are mythical.

  4. The United Kingdom is an imperial construct. Empires react only to threats – in all other cases they take collaboration as supplication. The Empire might have gone but not the mindset.

    Wales is poorly served politically – mainly our own fault. We have little vision of ourselves as an active political entity, or as an entity in the context of empire. When we switch on our constitutional brains, therefore, we are stuck in Westminster mode – everything is framed in that particular context. It gives us the politics of the Big Red Phone.

    Maybe we should start at the other end – at our feet – building up a political vision and a means of action. Most Welsh voters are pretty much in agreement on education, health, social policy and the economy but many feel that they cannot go any further without the go-ahead from Westminster, in its several guises. We should be able to proceed until the constitutional situation restrains us, which we can then push aside as we are upheld by the majority.

    The process of leaving the EU has shown us how that link has frayed – the Big Red Phone gives us conflicting messages, which, because of our unconfident polity leaves us in stasis. Rabbits. Headlights.

    Whilst the idea of a Confederation is admirable as a way of interrupting the dominance of the Big Red Phone, establishing such a relationship with the rest of the EU would probably be more effective, and avoid duplication.

    (If we needed another state to guide us then I’m sure that between Ireland, Scandinavia and especially the Baltic States, we would find ourselves in good company).

    Time for a little more confidence, friends.

Comments are closed.

Also within Politics and Policy