Andrew RT Davies outlines his plans to increase interest in Welsh politics and tackle voter apathy.
Last week I made a speech to the think-tank Gorwel, in which I outlined proposals that I believe would restore interest in Welsh politics and tackle the chronic issue of voter apathy – particularly amongst young people.
During that speech I announced plans to cut ministerial pay by 10%, with the additional funds being used to support youth engagement.
I also renewed calls for a full procedural review of the way the Assembly operates, to make proceedings more relevant and engaging.
Clearly the focus, during the next Assembly term, must be on bridging the democratic deficit; and Welsh politicians of all political colours should have an interest in making our political affairs as transparent as possible.
We must restore trust in politics and politicians – and I truly believe that Wales can lead the way, starting by reforming the process for key political appointments.
We’ve long called for Commissioners to be appointments of the Assembly; not the Welsh Government – ensuring they are more accountable, and representative, to the views of the people of Wales. Even Lord Dafydd Elis-Thomas broke ranks from his Plaid Cymru colleagues to back that policy this week.
It is my firm belief that before taking up a Ministerial post, AMs should be subject to ‘Confirmation Hearings’ in front of the appropriate Assembly Committee. A similar ‘hurdle’ – albeit, usually a symbolic one – exists in America, where appointments by the President are made subject to the approval of the Senate.
The necessity of obtaining Senate approval is in place to act as a check on presidential power, and here in Wales I can see a very persuasive case for checking the power of the Executive.
Committee members would not have power of veto over the First Minister’s cabinet appointments, but this symbolic process would shine a light on their suitability to serve in the cabinet – as well as giving the public a clearer sense of who holds these important positions of power in Wales.
It would also inject a dose of humility in the ministerial appointments process, reminding cabinet members that their appointments hinged on an election during which many other parties will have received votes and won seats.
And we must go further – delivering true transparency to the heart of Government; and inspiring public confidence in an institution which too many communities in Wales lack an understanding of, or appreciation, for.
Prominent bloggers, such as GuidoFawkes, often publish lists of Special Advisors – as though they’ve uncovered a guilty secret, tucked away in dark recesses of the Ministerial briefcase.
Such mistrust linked to significant Government appointments is unfortunate – and is something I’d want to change as First Minister of Wales.
The SPAD network has grown greatly in Wales in recent years; and their influence often rivals that of Ministers themselves; but could a single member of the Welsh public name one of the Welsh Government’s current crop?
In reality the SPAD phenomenon isn’t a new one at all, and advisers have been part of government deliberations since at least the 1800s. But the notoriety of prominent SPADs has certainly placed a greater level of scrutiny on their roles.
They have huge involvement in policy decisions, on what appears in the papers, and in what many Ministers say – all without an electoral mandate. And that’s why the appointments process needs to be reformed.
Clearly they play important roles, providing political advice and support to Ministers but it’s not unreasonable to suggest that before appointment, Special Advisers should be subject to similar scrutiny to Ministerial appointments – giving the Assembly an opportunity to properly assess their suitability for such high-profile, public, political roles; and provide a dose of reality to SPADs as to what their role should entail.
In recent days, I’ve articulated passionately a new vision for Welsh politics which not only devolves significant new power to local communities and prioritises localism; but also seeks a radical overhaul of how we do politics in Cardiff Bay.
For too many people across Wales, the Welsh Government is regarded as remote; out-of-touch and inaccessible. It is a Government which has too often appeared concerned with feathering its own nest – just this week backing huge increases in spend for central services and administration; whilst cutting other vital areas. Confirmation hearings could be another part of this toolkit – reminding Ministers who they’re in place to serve, injecting new levels of accountability and transparency in to our politics and aiding the creation of a nation of informed, active, engaged citizens.
5 thoughts on “An overhaul of politics in Cardiff Bay?”
You might say this, but I couldn’t possibly comment! Sounds positively ahem..dangerous?
Not much to argue with here.
What might really convince the electorate would be a Conservative led administration in England leading the way through implementing these types of reform in England to prove their efficacy.
Very good and important changes, as proposed here by the Leader of the Welsh Conservatives, are indeed needed to shine a light on the political process and improve democracy in Wales. The next improvement for the democratic system in Wales would be to tackle the problem of how to make AMs elected from the regional lists more responsive to the needs, values and wishes of the constituents they are supposed to represent?
At last someone realising that people do not want to know them but why just youth. This is a red herring. Its across the age spectrum. So if you want to increase ordinary peoples involvement in government. Scrap the assembly and all the councils. Have a lighter structure replace it with direct people involvement that will remove a huge debt burdon on the people through the outrageous council tax. Let ordinary people have a bigger say on planning for example. I propose that a new law be passed whereby all planning applications that involve and affect local communities and affecting mor than five homes or the culture and cohesivness of a community ornthe environment. The proposers would legally have to present a two week long presentation to that community and involve canvassing every homeowner and business with their proposals and objections taken up and plans altered as to the wishes of the people it affects before any planning is granted. The cost of all of this plus an additional cost of paying for opposition costs would be born by the applicant. This way politicians and community leaders would have to work in the community properly not just pay lip service as many do.
We have six Cabinet ministers and a few juniors. A bit of turnover and that’s 10 hearings. Each minister has two Spads who might last two or three years so that’s anywhere between 15 and 40 hearings per Assembly term. I think it’s a really good idea but I note that AMs are typically serving on several subject Committees each, and not always making a great job of it. This suggestion would have carried more conviction if RTD had fessed up that we need more AMs to do the job properly. Not all correspondents to this blog are sympathetic to the National Assembly but everyone should agree it is pointless to spoil the ship for a ha’porth of tar.
Comments are closed.