Setting the Bar for a Green Brexit in Food and Farming

Dr Ludivine Petetin, Dr Viviane Gravey and Dr Brendan Moore share new research into sustainable agri-food systems

Dr Ludivine Petetin is a Lecturer in Law at the School of Law and Politics and Wales Governance Centre of Cardiff University and a Brexit & Environment Associate specialising in agricultural law, trade and Welsh policy. Dr Viviane Gravey is a Lecturer in European Politics at Queen’s University Belfast and Co-chair of the Brexit & Environment network. Dr Brendan Moore is a Senior Research Associate at the University of East Anglia and the Brexit & Environment network coordinator. 

As the UK prepares to leave the European Union (EU), the future of agriculture is high on the political agenda. Since the EU Referendum result, the UK Government has repeatedly promised a ‘Green Brexit’, whereby the UK would learn from the mistakes of the CAP and replace it with policies putting the ‘environment first’. But what would this mean in practice, and are current developments going in the right direction? In a new report Setting the Bar for a Green Brexit in Food and Farming, commissioned by the Soil Association, we aim to set the bar for a Green Brexit in food and farming based on new research and case studies of innovative agricultural policies across Europe.

 

The shadow of the Common Agricultural Policy

Since joining the EU, UK agriculture has been strongly influenced by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), leading to strong Europeanisation of agricultural policy in the UK. For over twenty years, the CAP has also been interpreted and implemented differently across the UK’s four nations, which differ in the levels of financial support and the importance of agri-environment-climate payments. Even after Brexit, the CAP will continue to impact farming in the UK due to the close competition between the two markets.

 

Political commitments to policy change in the UK

During the referendum campaign, the Vote Leave campaign presented Brexit as a ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ opportunity to ‘take back control of the regulation of agriculture’, reduce regulatory burdens and continue to financially support farmers.

 

Since June 2016, ministers at UK level have made a number of promises related to food and farming. Three of these commitments are central: to ‘take back control’; to deliver a ‘Green Brexit’ that improves the environment through the provision of ‘public monies for public goods’; and to ensure that international trade negotiations do not lead to a weakening of environmental standards (which will depend both on the future trade relationship with the EU and new free trade agreements with e.g. the United States).

 

Leaving the EU and the CAP means abandoning a shared framework of agricultural, environmental and trade policies. While more diversity can be desirable to a certain extent, common frameworks are necessary to avoid a race to the bottom and to foster a race to the top in environmental, food and farming standards.

 

Impact on devolution and implications for Wales

In the UK, there is not one but four implementations of the CAP for Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and England. Through CAP differentiation, the starting point for a post-Brexit agriculture is heterogeneity.

 

The Agriculture Bill can be perceived to lead to a certain recentralisation of powers in Westminster to the detriment of the devolved administrations, especially with Clause 28 of the Bill related to the Agreement on Agriculture of the World Trade Organisation. England is leading the way with the Agriculture Bill. This has consequences for the design of agricultural policies across the devolved administrations. All four agricultural consultations of 2018 place at their heart the twin aims of improving productivity and delivering public goods and/or ecosystem services – thus running the risk of going back to what is familiar under the CAP.

 

In Wales, in a recent statement, Lesley Griffiths AM, Minister for Environment, Energy and Rural Affairs, proposed that the economic resilience and public goods schemes put forward in the 2018 ‘Brexit and our land’ consultation be combined into a single sustainable farming scheme. By bringing together productivity and public goods under one scheme, environmental protection and rural development could become subsumed under intensification and economic goals – one of the central issues of the CAP.

 

Brexit offers the opportunity to rethink public support and policies on agriculture, yet old habits are difficult to leave behind.

 

Learning from innovative policies and practices within the EU

While the CAP has historically been linked to a deterioration in soil, air and water quality, habitat clearance, loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystems, recent CAP reforms have attempted to ‘green’ agriculture. These reforms have made it possible for EU Member States to pursue ambitious, differentiated yet complementary policies for farming and food, alongside the CAP – belying the policy’s one size fits all image.

 

Our report, Setting the Bar for a Green Brexit in Food and Farming, reviews five examples of innovative domestic policies in Spain (fair trading practices in the food supply chain), Italy (social agriculture), France (agroecology and agroforestry) and Denmark (organic food), and how the UK could adopt and adapt policies in each issue area. Future agricultural policies in Wales could draw key lessons from these case studies and foster more sustainable agri-food systems.

 

Pathways to deliver a Green Brexit in food and farming

Taken together, our research leads us to draw five key take-home messages:

  • Re-thinking agriculture is not just about agricultural policy. It requires changes to training, land-use rights, education, trade arrangements, consumption patterns and the entire supply chain (acknowledging that primary producers are often the weakest link in that chain).

 

  • Long-term targets are needed. These targets should be based on cross-party and cross-sector consensus on a shared farming future – together with short- and medium-term evaluation to make it possible to hold decision-makers to account. Such long-term targets would create much-needed clarity and stability for all parts of the food supply chain to guide their investments.

 

  • Change takes time and requires collaboration. Cooperation and collaboration between farmers, and between farmers and other stakeholders is key to deliver a sustainable farming future. Collaboration is also needed to help farmers and the broader food system withstand shocks (both financial and climatic) and build resilience.

 

  • A shared policy framework can accommodate and benefit from local divergence and innovation. Our examples of innovative policies and practices happened in countries working within and alongside the constraints of the CAP.

 

  • Holistic, complementary and forward-looking approaches to food and farming are crucial to deliver a sustainable farming future where food and farming are co-designed.

 

Photo by Jake Gard on Unsplash

All articles published on Click on Wales are subject to IWA’s disclaimer

 

While you’re here, we’ve got something to ask you: will you join us?

We’re working every day to bring the right people together and generate the ideas to make Wales a world-leading force.

We’re independent of government and political parties. We provide a much-needed space for open, transparent debate about the ideas that can make Wales better.

To continue to do this, we need people like you to join us.

Join us today and you’ll be supporting vital work that’s making our country better than ever.

Find out more