Wales after Brexit

Kevin Morgan reviews two recent economic policy documents from the Welsh Government

A bit like the proverbial bus, we had a long wait for a new economic strategy and suddenly two appear at the same time. But by any standards this has been a momentous week for economic policy in Wales: on Tuesday the Welsh Government unveiled its long awaited Economic Action Plan (EAP) and on Thursday it launched a new policy paper called Regional Investment in Wales After Brexit. While the former applies to the current Assembly term, the latter applies to the period after 2020.

The EAP is notable for four things: (i) it heralds a new economic contract between government and business by making financial aid conditional on firms delivering social goals; (ii) it abandons the old priority sectors in favour of 3 national thematic sectors, namely tradeable services, high value manufacturing and growth enablers like digital; (iii) it reinforces the commitment to regional working by creating Chief Regional Officers to coordinate policy in North Wales, Mid and South West Wales, and South East Wales; and (iv) it makes a formal commitment to the Foundational Economy, a collective term for sectors that have been over-looked and under-valued by policy-makers even though they play an important role in meeting social needs, sectors like care and food for example.

While all these things are laudable, the main criticism that can be levelled at the EAP is that it is totally devoid of milestones and targets to assess progress and hold the government to account.

The Regional Investment Policy (RIP) is more of a futuristic exercise designed to prepare Wales for life after Brexit. Politically speaking, it tries to address two different audiences: in Wales it aims to reassure its stakeholders that it is preparing for the future; but it is also signalling its intentions to Whitehall, where many of the economic policy levers will remain after Brexit.

Because it is addressing Whitehall, the RIP is at pains to establish the continuing need for regional aid, based on the fact that Wales contains some of the most deprived communities in the UK. To illustrate the point it says that Blaenau Gwent and Merthyr have the 1st and 5th highest proportion of adults without any qualifications of local authorities in England and Wales, at 36% and 34.3% respectively.  Although these deprived areas are most dependent on the Foundational Economy, the latter is conspicuous by its absence in this document even though it loomed large in the EAP.

The RIP says that Wales must build on the lessons learned from EU Structural Funds, a regional policy approach that is based on tried and tested principles – principles like multi-annual programming to offer a long term vision; transparent criteria for assessing viable projects; robust monitoring and evaluation systems to establish what works where and why; and above all, multi-level partnerships in which regional delivery is complemented by national oversight.

But the Welsh Government is surely getting ahead of itself when it says “we have the partnerships already in place, at all levels, to go on making a success of this vitally important area”. The regional partnerships in Cardiff Capital Region, Swansea Bay and North Wales have certainly come a long way in a short time, but they are still finding their feet. Fortunately, there is still time to build capacity, through new regional centres of excellence for example, but this issue will not get the attention it deserves if the Welsh Government thinks these partnerships are “already in place”.

One of the most important chapters in the report is devoted to the challenge of cross-border working, where borders are seen to be both geographic and bureaucratic.  The biggest cross-border challenges for Wales are twofold: how to make the most of the EU despite Brexit and how to manage the post-Brexit relationship with Whitehall.

The Welsh Government wants to maintain its involvement with EU networks for as long as possible and it is right to insist on this because the UK will pay to play in European programmes like Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020. So Wales will need to redouble its commitment to European networks of research and innovation as these links will remain important long after Brexit. Much the same applies to the Single Market, which already takes 60% of Welsh exports.  

Managing the relationship with Whitehall will be no less challenging because there is currently a total absence of trust between the governments in Cardiff Bay and London. Two immediate challenges concern governance arrangements and the distribution of EU funds.

On the governance front the Welsh Government is proposing a Council of Economic Ministers from the 4 nations, a forum designed to coordinate policy within common UK frameworks. To date such fora have not worked well, not least because Whitehall has little respect for them.

The latent conflict between Cardiff Bay and London could come to a head over the distribution of EU funds. In total some £680 million currently flow annually to Wales and the Welsh Government wants this sum factored into its Block Grant instead. Of this sum, EU regional policy funds account for £370 million and it is not at all clear if this will be administered in Wales or in Whitehall. The early signs suggest that Whitehall would prefer the funds to be deployed through the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, a new UK-wide regional policy.

This could trigger the first major flashpoint of Post-Brexit Britain because the Welsh Government says “We explicitly and vigorously reject any notion of a UK centralisation of regional economic development policy, including the creation of a Whitehall managed UK Prosperity Fund”.  

Faced with so many imponderables, all we can say for sure is that, after Brexit, Wales will find itself in a harsher and more demanding economic and political environment. Beyond 2020 the fortunes of the Welsh economy will depend on many things, not least unfettered access to the Single Market, a decent deal in Whitehall and more robust partnership arrangements within Wales.

An abridged version of this article originally appeared in the Western Mail. 

All articles published on Click on Wales are subject to IWA’s disclaimer.

2 thoughts on “Wales after Brexit

  1. Wales after Brexit? We have already had “one” country leave a federal union, despite the economics, because they were unhappy with that very successful federal union. Perhaps its time to consider Wexit.

    The UK has one of the largest debts of the developed world but still survives and thrives, Wales can do the same. The rise of “populist” movements, code for far right nationalist movements and good old fashioned protectionism, with an unhealthy dose of racism, will put Wales on the express lane to a 1930s style economic graveyard. The far right movement want all power concentrated in Mess-Minster and want to close down the Welsh, N. Irish and Scotland governments. Never mind the mayhem that will cause in Scotland and Ireland, that will actually be a bonus to the far right as any resulting mayhem will be heralded by them as proof they were right to close down the devolved governments. Protectionism has never worked but again that will not cause the far right any problem, it will be heralded as typical anti-English jealousy by the Europeans, Americans, insert any other nationality, and they will encourage us to buy, buy and buy more English goods and to boycott, boycott and boycott foreign goods. A dystopian fantasy that will wreck the UK, just as in the 1930s the same bugger my neighbour protectionism wrecked the world economy.

    The best option, economically, as always been for the UK to stay in the EU and for Wales to stay in the UK. But the predatory nature of the “populists”, which include land grabs from Wales, Monmouthshire being one, Flintshire being another, gives Wales a simple choice. Assimilation into England , with most Welsh counties being annexed to England, and Wales being a poorer version of the North East, or Independence .

    Make no mistake and do not underestimate the phenomena of the modern far right, they will not stop, whatever the cost, until they get their way. They would rather live in a hovel and pretend its a palace than live in a palace with non-believers.

    Sadly unless the phenomenon of the far right exhausts itself and disappears where it belings into the footnotes of history, the preferred option of a modern, outward looking federal UK is itself history and it will be time to write another chapter in Wales history.

  2. The analyses have a missing element. They accept the situation as it presents itself. ‘Somebody else’ has decided the grand game and we must make of it what we can (albeit aware of potential conflicts).

    This is devolved government sitting tidily within the play-pen created for it by those in power.

    If the Republic of Ireland and the North can have a barrier free border between them, then why can’t we with England? We could remain in the EU (in whatever constitutional arrangement that is most expedient) and would surely benefit from being the EU gateway for many firms from England marooned outside the Single Market/ Customs Union. Scotland, Ireland and Wales would make a powerful (loose Scandinavian style) confederation with a combined population of 12m.

    Leaving the EU is completely at odds with the economic wellbeing of Wales and is an existential threat. It needs big political action to avert it, and it needs leadership.

Comments are closed.

Also within Politics and Policy